mirror of
https://github.com/OrcaSlicer/OrcaSlicer.git
synced 2026-09-19 15:03:05 +00:00
Tommaso Bianchi
5f1811c2c5
A boolean cut whose tool misses the target is a perfectly legal
operation: OCCT reports IsDone(), the shape comes back unchanged, and the
feature lands in the recipe reporting ok:true. Driving the MCP socket,
that produced two consecutive {ok: true, bodies: 1, error: ''} responses
for a hole that was never drilled -- same viewport, same 46939.11 mm3 --
and the tree grew two Hole features that will never cut anything. A
caller, an agent especially, has no signal at all that the thing it asked
for did not happen.
Measure the volume across the op in route_feature's in-place branch and
refuse the no-op. Only for removals: Hole, Thread, and Extrude / Revolve
/ Sweep / Loft in Cut mode. Everything else may legitimately leave the
volume alone -- a Transform certainly does. The tolerance is relative,
because an absolute epsilon is wrong across the mm-to-metre range of real
parts, and a cut that shaves a numerically invisible sliver is a miss
too. The existing rollback in the MCP actions already preserves the
reason, so a missed hole now answers ok:false with the error and undoes
the feature.
The confusion underneath was not itself a bug: hole's x/y are in the
sketch plane's frame, whose origin is describe_scene's modeling_origin,
and describe_tools documented them only as "number, unit mm". Passing the
world centre put the hole 135 mm clear of the solid. All six x/y params
on hole / hole_styled / hole_standard now say which frame they are in,
since the wrong guess was silent.
Regression test drives the reported failure directly: a hole at x=135 on
a 20x20x20 box is rejected and leaves the body untouched, the same hole
at the origin still removes exactly pi*4^2*20, and a cut-mode extrude
whose profile sits at x=200 is rejected too. 152 cases / 2083 assertions
green on both forks.
snaporca-daf.