Files
OrcaSlicer/tests
Tommaso Bianchi 5f1811c2c5 A subtraction that removes nothing is an error, not a silent success
A boolean cut whose tool misses the target is a perfectly legal
operation: OCCT reports IsDone(), the shape comes back unchanged, and the
feature lands in the recipe reporting ok:true. Driving the MCP socket,
that produced two consecutive {ok: true, bodies: 1, error: ''} responses
for a hole that was never drilled -- same viewport, same 46939.11 mm3 --
and the tree grew two Hole features that will never cut anything. A
caller, an agent especially, has no signal at all that the thing it asked
for did not happen.

Measure the volume across the op in route_feature's in-place branch and
refuse the no-op. Only for removals: Hole, Thread, and Extrude / Revolve
/ Sweep / Loft in Cut mode. Everything else may legitimately leave the
volume alone -- a Transform certainly does. The tolerance is relative,
because an absolute epsilon is wrong across the mm-to-metre range of real
parts, and a cut that shaves a numerically invisible sliver is a miss
too. The existing rollback in the MCP actions already preserves the
reason, so a missed hole now answers ok:false with the error and undoes
the feature.

The confusion underneath was not itself a bug: hole's x/y are in the
sketch plane's frame, whose origin is describe_scene's modeling_origin,
and describe_tools documented them only as "number, unit mm". Passing the
world centre put the hole 135 mm clear of the solid. All six x/y params
on hole / hole_styled / hole_standard now say which frame they are in,
since the wrong guess was silent.

Regression test drives the reported failure directly: a hole at x=135 on
a 20x20x20 box is rejected and leaves the body untouched, the same hole
at the origin still removes exactly pi*4^2*20, and a cut-mode extrude
whose profile sits at x=200 is rejected too. 152 cases / 2083 assertions
green on both forks.

snaporca-daf.
2026-07-27 07:21:06 +02:00
..
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00

OrcaSlicer tests

Building, running and writing tests is documented on the wiki, under How to Test.

Two files here rather than there, because coding agents only read what is in the repository:

  • AGENTS.md is the same guidance in short form, and is what an agent working under tests/ picks up.
  • CATCH2.md is the Catch2 reference, including the mistakes that break a test at runtime.