Files
OrcaSlicer/tests/libslic3r
Tommaso Bianchi b9d6b59f90 A feature that destroys a body must say so, not ship a phantom
Driving the control socket: hexagon prism, six vertical fillets, four chamfers
on the already-filleted rim, an M8 hole. Afterwards describe_scene reported
bodies=3 and error='' — entirely healthy — while body 2's TopoDS_Shape was null.
Only mass_properties on that one body revealed anything was wrong.

So a feature destroyed a body, recompute() returned true, and the document went
on advertising it. Any downstream consumer — slicing, STEP export, a mass
properties report — met a null shape with no warning. That is the silent
corruption class, which is the one class this project does not tolerate.

recompute() now scans the freshly built bodies for a null shape, names the body
and the feature that destroyed it, and returns false. Returning false rather than
just setting error is the point: it hands the caller its normal rollback path, so
the operation that destroyed the body is undone instead of committed.

The message says "an unidentified feature" when source_feature is -1. "feature 0"
would be a lie, and a message that exists to tell you where to look has to be
trusted.

TEST IS A POSITIVE CONTRACT, AND THE REASON MATTERS. The reported order was
driven headlessly first, as the better test: it does NOT reproduce. The dress-up
step throws "fillet radius too large", which is an already-loud already-caught
path, so recompute fails honestly and never nulls a body. No public-API sequence
found so far reaches the guard's branch without a GUI, and faking a null into
`bodies` after the fact would not exercise it — the guard runs on `built`, before
the swap. So the test asserts what can be asserted: a box + fillet recomputes
true, error is empty, and no body is null. The guard's own branch is defensive
and currently unexercised; that is stated here rather than implied by a green
suite.

Kernel suite: 2217 assertions in 161 test cases, all passing. No existing test
relied on a null body surviving a recompute, so hardening this broke nothing.

snaporca-5425 (part a). Part b — why the chamfer chain degenerates on an
already-filleted rim — is untouched and stays open.
2026-08-12 20:57:35 +02:00
..
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00
2026-07-19 12:07:58 +08:00
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00
2026-07-02 17:49:36 +08:00
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00
2025-12-08 22:42:11 +08:00