Brings in 560 commits (merge base 2026-07-04 .. origin/main af9fd10d7a).
19 conflicts resolved; the other 138 touched files auto-merged.
Conflict resolutions
- Snapmaker/Polymaker (7): main normalised JSON key order in #15039 while this
branch inserted filament_id/filament_vendor. Took main's key order and kept
this branch's values, inserting a single filament_id key rather than letting
git's line merge leave duplicate "from"/"instantiation" keys.
- re3D rPETG @0.8/@1.75 nozzle (2): main renamed these from "re3D Greengate
rPETG @*" and re-vendored GreenGate3D -> re3D (#15169). Git's rename-aware
merge produced a file with two filament_vendor keys; took main's version
wholesale instead. The id is reconciled by the tooling, not by hand.
- re3D rPP (1): kept main's inherits change (fdm_filament_pet -> fdm_filament_pp,
local filament_type override dropped) and its widened compatible_printers.
The flattened type is still PP, so the product triple and id OFfHGM1D are
unchanged.
- re3D Greengate rPETG.json, Afinia {ABS+,ABS,PLA,TPU,Value ABS,Value PLA}.json
(7 modify/delete): accepted main's deletions. The Afinia ids are not orphaned
- the surviving @HS presets resolve the same triple and already carry the
same ids, so nothing is retired.
- .github/workflows/check_profiles.yml: kept both main's new "validate slice"
step and this branch's tree-wide filament-subtype check.
- tests/libslic3r/CMakeLists.txt: kept both test_filament_id_succession.cpp and
main's test_preset_diff.cpp.
Verified
- No conflict markers; all 12795 profile JSONs parse with no duplicate keys.
- All branch artifacts (tooling, snapshot, ledger, doc, tests) intact and
unmodified by the merge.
- The succession-ledger C++ call sites survived main's refactors; audited
Preset.{cpp,hpp}, PresetBundle.cpp, DeviceManager.cpp, PresetComboBoxes.cpp,
CaliHistoryDialog.cpp, MoonrakerPrinterAgent.cpp against base/ours/theirs.
- scripts/tests: 115/116 pass.
Known follow-up: assign_filament_ids.py --check reports 243 errors, all from
filament data main added in the last month (BBL/addnorth, Qidi X5/Plus 5,
Snapmaker U1, re3D). The single failing unit test is the live-tree conformance
test asserting that count is zero. Reconciliation lands separately.
* update snapmaker profiles. largely ported for Snapmaker Orca fork
* update prime volume
* set precise_outer_wall to 1
* Update per-material multi-tool ramming to the filament library
* Add per-filament overrides for toolchange retraction
* Set toolchange retraction per filament for Snapmaker U1
* set default support type to tree
* format snapmaker profiles
Every remaining legacy filament_id outside the BBL/QD_* islands re-derives
from its product triple (filament_vendor / filament_type / family name),
completing the content-addressed id model of filament_id_plan_v3.md:
- Relocation pre-step: 14 fdm_filament_* template forks (Cubicon x3,
Prusa x6, RH3D x6 minus the pc fork already re-homed) stop declaring
ids; the 16 presets that rode Prusa's forks now declare the id they
already resolved (verified zero effective-id drift over all 5892
instantiated presets).
- --drop-redundant-ids: 6 Custom/MyToolChanger generics drop copied GF
ids and ride their OFL families.
- --remint over all 62 non-island vendors: 2647 declarations re-derived;
identical products converge cross-bundle (showcase: PolyLite PLA is now
OF5CgdDq in OrcaFilamentLibrary, Qidi, OrcaArena and Snapmaker).
- Prusament @XL completions surfaced by the relocation: filament_vendor
["Prusa Polymers"] on the 8 @XL declarers; Prusament PA-CF typed
PA11-CF (the product is Prusament PA11CF) and PC-CF typed PC-CF
(-CF family typed as base polymer); each family converges on one id.
- Succession: 331 ids retired with mode-rule successors, 355 never-shipped
v1 mints forgotten with chain splicing, 151 GF-shaped ids released to
the island space with hints, 27 curated BBL-generic -> OFL-generic
hints (GFL99 -> OFDSrzZ8 class). New --retire "OLD=NEW" maintenance
mode records lineage for OGFC99/OGFG99/OGFN99 (the shipped ids of OFL's
Generic PC/PETG/PA in released versions, whose claims migrated in v3.1
while Cubicon's inert fork declarations kept them alive).
- Retiring the P-hex system ids removes the last system ids from
check_ams_filament_valid's destructive P-gate.
- AMS-ambiguity fixes surfaced by convergence (validator -f): 4 presets
riding another family's id through inherits now declare their true
family id (Elegoo Generic ASA-CF/PETG-CF, Snapmaker PolyLite Dual PLA /
PolyLite J1 PLA); 9 Cubicon @base presets and Dremel Generic PLA, which
duplicate their per-printer variants on the same printers, split onto
the salt-1 iteration of their triple (sanctioned by the mint-conformance
check; --remint now leaves salt-conformant declarations alone).
Gates: assign_filament_ids --check 0; orca_extra_profile_check 0;
116 python unit tests; config-equivalence over all 5892 instantiated
presets (byte-identical configs except the 14 sanctioned Prusament
vendor/type corrections; setting_id and compatible_printers unchanged;
per-family convergence and ledger conservation verified); profile
validator base/-f/-r(BBL)/-r(Qidi) all green; libslic3r_tests 48610
assertions; Moonraker OFL generic map check; custom-preset fixture
archives v1.9.0-v2.4.1.
Reduce the size of current and new JSONs by standardising them with 1 tab indentation instead of 4 spaces.
This effectively reduces the size by almost 20 MB.
| Current | New |
|---|---|
| 85.2 Mib | 67 Mib |
Used [JQ](https://jqlang.org/) `--tab` to automatically format every current JSON.
> [!NOTE]
> Some profiles had the arrays on the same line, but those created by Orca were in the standard format (each object below the previous one). In some cases, this increases the number of tabs due to the new lines, but the increase is negligible, and this way both the base profiles and those created by Orca maintain the same style.
# Description
* What issue does this PR address or fix?
1. Refactor Polymaker folder within Snapmaker profile directory, so that the structure is more clear.
2. Add more Polymaker filament presets for Snapmaker printers.
* What new features or enhancements does this PR introduce?
1. None
* Are there any breaking changes or dependencies that need to be considered?
1. None
