Revolve failed on a sketch whose profile was closed. Decoding the reported 3mf: four
entities forming a proper closed loop (joints open by 4.44e-06 mm, well inside
tolerance) plus one stray 1.82 mm Line at (-24.2, 80.3), inside the shaded region,
touching nothing.
The viewport's region_loops discards open chains ON PURPOSE — it exists to find
EXTRUDABLE regions — so the user saw one clean closed region. entities_to_wires kept
the stray as its own one-edge loop, so it returned two wires, and Revolve goes through
entities_to_wire which demands exactly one. Extrude would have failed one step later in
wires_to_face, because a one-edge open wire bounds no face. Same class as the tolerance
split fixed in 8b568b7b: the viewport and the kernel disagreeing about the sketch — this
time about what BELONGS to the profile.
entities_to_wires/entities_to_wire/build_sketch_wire take closed_only. It is not a
blanket rule: a SurfaceExtrude builds a sheet FROM an open profile and a Sweep PATH is
normally open, so all ten call sites are classified individually — true for the face
fallback, Extrude-taper, Revolve, the Sweep PROFILE and Loft profiles; false for
SurfaceExtrude/Revolve/Loft/Fill and the Sweep path.
A component counts as open when some welded node has DEGREE 1. The first attempt used
"the traversal did not return to its starting node", which regressed the bridged C
profile: a closed loop that also carries a second edge across the same two nodes has no
free endpoint, but its Eulerian walk ends elsewhere. Degree-1 is the property that
actually distinguishes a stray segment from a closed profile; the suite caught the
difference.
Behaviour change decided by Tommaso: a stray is IGNORED, not refused. The test that
required refusal dates from when ignoring meant falling through to a default rectangle —
geometry nobody drew. That fallback is gone, so ignoring now builds the circle the user
actually drew. Its assertion is updated with the reason.
The bridge round-trip test extruded an ENTIRELY open chain and "worked" only because
OCCT will make a face from an open wire. It gets a genuinely closed profile: the test is
about serialization, and deserialize_recipe recomputes, so the document has to be one
that legitimately builds.
Failures now say WHERE. sketch_open_ends reports free endpoints under the same weld
tolerance the wire build uses, and open_loop_message is shared by both throws, because
Extrude fails through build_sketch_face and Revolve through build_sketch_wire — enriching
only one would have left the commoner path the less informative one.
Kernel 66115 assertions / 608 cases green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011FbJKJAJxxkhDTs9XdZzKA
Port of snaporca e635627b81. Parity OK: 17 files identical, 8 diverging at their
expected counts.
The last reference an industrial sketcher offers that this one did not: Onshape's
Use, SolidWorks' Convert Entities. Project already turned a body's 3D edges into
2D Lines, Circles and Arcs on a plane, but the result landed in its OWN feature,
so while drawing in one sketch you could not borrow an existing body's edge and
constrain to it.
No new geometry code: Project's per-edge conversion loop is factored into
project_edges_to_entities() and called from a second entry point that appends
into an EXISTING sketch with construction = true. The loop appears once now,
not twice.
Construction is what makes it cheap and safe: SketchEngine already skips
construction entities when building wires, so the references guide without being
built, and being otherwise ordinary entities every constraint from this epic --
Collinear, EqualRadius, the axis-projected distances, PointOnLine, Symmetric --
works against them for free.
Part of this refactors working code, so Project's behaviour identity is the
invariant; the existing [CadDocument][project] cases guard it and a new case
asserts a Project feature still emits construction == false.
project_edges_into_sketch returns the number of entities appended, or -1 on a bad
reference rather than throwing.
VERIFICATION LIMIT, as with the previous four commits: this fork's kernel suite
still cannot run (find_package(assimp) at configure time, snaporca-w80c). Shared
sources are byte-identical to snaporca's, where kernel is 7700 assertions / 270
cases and ALL LADDERS HELD 7/7.
The recipe's 3MF entry moved from Metadata/SnapOrca_cad.bin to
Metadata/orca_cad.bin, so projects saved by earlier builds opened with an
empty Design tab. Both 3MF backends now read either name and write only the
new one; the recipe version advances to 6 to mark the move.
Port of snaporca 1bb9825db0. Four defects from an independent 20-agent audit,
each verified in the code first; two further findings from the same report were
verified OUT and are not in this commit.
remove_feature()/move_feature() remapped Extrude::sketch_ref and a Mate's two
connectors and nothing else, leaving seven of the nine index-bearing fields —
sweep_path_ref, loft_profile_refs[], pattern_curve_sketch, rib_sketch_ref, and
sketch_ref on Revolve, Sweep, Rib and the Surface* family — pointing at whatever
slid into the slot. Quiet by construction: the shifted index still names a real
feature, recompute() succeeds, the solid is built from the wrong profile. The
comment above the loop already required "EVERY field holding a feature index"; the
code under it handled two, because a type switch is only correct on the day it is
written. for_each_feature_ref() visits the FIELDS instead, so a feature type added
later is covered the moment it reuses one. plane_base and axis_plane_a/b are
excluded on purpose and documented at the helper — they encode an ordinal into the
datum-plane list, not an index into features[], and are filed separately. The
delete cascade got the same field-based treatment.
The regression test was run against the pre-fix code to prove it bites: all three
sections fail there, and move_feature returns TRUE while leaving sketch_ref == 1
where it must be 0 — success with the wrong answer, which is what makes this class
expensive.
apply_constraint, commit_entity_constraints and delete_constraint mutated the
recipe with no checkpoint() and no sync_recipe_to_model(), alone among seventeen
mutation sites in that file: Ctrl+Z reached past the constraint edit and discarded
unrelated work, and saving persisted the pre-constraint blob. A rejected constraint
now calls abandon_checkpoint() rather than leaving an undo step that does nothing.
MCP: params["generation"].get<uint64_t>() sat outside the try inside a bare
CallAfter lambda, so one malformed string terminated the process through the wx
event loop; it is type-checked now and the lambda lets nothing escape. The socket
bound with no mode of its own in a world-writable directory — umask around bind()
plus chmod, and it refuses to listen rather than listen wide. The reply write is no
longer a bare write(), which could SIGPIPE the app when a client hung up.
Kernel suite on this fork: 190 cases / 2562 assertions, green. GUI target compiles.
The full ladder gate ran on snaporca (ALL LADDERS HELD — gestures 98/98, offer
108/108, corpus and corpus-scale green) and fork-check parity holds at 17 identical
/ 8 diverging as expected, which is what makes that gate transferable here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MrMzTpAf78U4NG2M8jfvHY
User report 2026-08-23, and it is right: "you have renamed the feature extrusion,
not the body. i clicked rename on the body feature tree and the feature extrude
changed name. this means that you consider the extrusion = the body. this is very
far from truth as a body can contain several extrusions."
That is exactly what the previous commit did. It resolved a selected body to
CadBody::source_feature and renamed THAT feature, on the reasoning that a body has
no name of its own. The reasoning described an implementation detail — CadBody::
name is derived and restamped on every recompute — and mistook it for the user's
model. An Extrude, a Cut and a Fillet all land on the same body: the maker is one
operation in its history, and renaming it renames the wrong object.
A body now has a name of its own. CadBody::user_name, set only by a rename, is:
- carried across recompute() by body index, next to the per-body colour override
and under the same index contract the GUI already relies on for visibility and
Move — without which a name would survive exactly until the next feature;
- written into the recipe, because bodies are recomputed and never serialised, so
a name has nowhere else to live and would otherwise vanish on reopen;
- shown on the Bodies row ahead of the derived maker name, as "Body N — name",
with the number still leading because every status line, the interference
report and the mate errors identify a body that way.
The recipe block is APPENDED after the variables block rather than given a version
bump. A build that predates it reads features and variables, returns, and never
looks at the trailing bytes — so yesterday's projects open here and today's
projects still open there. A bump would have cost every project written today its
readability by the previous build, for one optional field.
Renaming a FEATURE is unchanged. The feature tree renames features; the Bodies
list renames bodies; neither reaches into the other.
WHAT THIS COST, and why it is written down. Getting here took two wrong turns
inside one fix, both mine:
1. UnselectAll() -> Unselect(). Both trees are wxTR_SINGLE, where UnselectAll()
— the MULTI-selection call — does nothing. That was the one-word reason the
rename had been vetoed everywhere (BEGIN_LABEL_EDIT refuses while
tree_body_selection() >= 0). Fixing it turned a pair of harmless no-ops into
a real loop: the two lists clear each other so "the target" is unambiguous,
so clicking a body row ran apply_body_row -> m_tree->Unselect() -> the feature
tree's SEL_CHANGED -> m_parts->Unselect(), which cleared the row just clicked.
The handler now clears the other list only when it actually holds a selection.
2. Trusting a screenshot taken after a polluted run. A leftover Rib card had
shifted the whole panel, so a click measured against it landed nowhere near
the row. Relaunch, then measure.
VERIFIED, on the rig and in the kernel:
body renamed ('Extrude', user_name=False) -> ('Bracket', user_name=True)
features untouched ['Sketch', 'Extrude'] before and after
survives a recompute add a Hole to the same body: features become
['Sketch', 'Extrude', 'Hole'], body stays 'Bracket'
survives the recipe serialize -> deserialize -> 'Bracket'
New kernel test "a body carries its own name, through recompute and the recipe"
pins all three properties; the suite is 189 cases / 2547 assertions.
Gate green: ALL LADDERS HELD — offer table matches the atlas, kernel suite,
engine rungs 1-8, 977-sheet corpus + the heaviest sheets, gesture ladder 98/98,
offer ladder 108/108.
and a ladder that draws with the mouse
Three commits carried across (snaporca 4ffd60eacb, 421055c2ec, b71216ce0b):
1. A design made only of sketches must survive being saved. CadDocument::recompute
returned false with "no solid-producing features" for a document that has no
solid, and two callers read that as "unusable": the GUI syncs the 3MF recipe
only after a successful recompute, so a sketch-only design was saved with no
recipe at all, and deserialize_recipe ends with `return recompute()`, so even a
project that carried one was refused on load. Having nothing to build is now a
success; a feature that MEANT to build a solid and produced none still fails.
DesignPanel::refresh_tree syncs the recipe too, for the paths that call
m_doc.recompute() directly.
2. Scripted geometry arrives exact. The Horizontal/Vertical inference window and
the endpoint weld window both close to zero for add_entities_scripted; void
attribution probes from a point strictly inside each loop instead of from its
first vertex. Corpus rung 39 graded / 39 fully clean, was 35 with 6 failures.
3. scripts/gui-ladder.py — 17 rungs, 84 properties, all driven by synthetic clicks
and typed values rather than through the socket.
Parity 17 identical / 8 diverging as expected. Kernel suite here: 188 cases /
2532 assertions.
snaporca-mtav, snaporca-8xg1, snaporca-5hvl, snaporca-730j
Review request on PR #15238: "Place CAD-related files (e.g. CadDocument/
GeometryEngine) into a separate folder."
src/libslic3r/CAD/ the kernel — CadDocument, GeometryEngine, the four
Sketch* units, SketchSolver, ThreadStandards
src/slic3r/GUI/CAD/ the tab — DesignPanel, DesignCanvas, DesignSketchTool,
SketchInlineEditor, McpControl, generated DesignOffer
Pure relocation: no line of logic changes. Two include rewrites follow from it —
files that moved re-spell their own neighbours against src/ (already on the
include path), and files that did not move pick up the new folder. docs and
docs/ux/mockups/gen_offer_table.py follow the same paths.
Verified: libslic3r, libslic3r_gui and libslic3r_tests all build, CAD suite green
at 2518 assertions in 194 test cases, and the sibling fork builds identically —
17 shared sources still byte-identical, 8 diverging by their expected counts.
Tommaso Bianchi