Wiki Update part 5 (#9873)

* BASE

* precise wall and z moved

* PolyHoles

* Arc-fitting

* X-Y Compensation

* Elephant foot + moved images

* Update quality_settings_precision.md

* Wall generator and more

* Full Reorder

* TPMS-D bases

* Update strength_settings_infill.md

* Image Fix + Infill desc calculator

* Descriptions + image fix

Co-Authored-By: Rodrigo <162915171+RF47@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update cornering-calib.md

* minor fixes

* Wip updated

* Missing fills

* Update infill_desc_calculator.xlsx

* Update infill_desc_calculator.xlsx

* Update infill documentation and images

Removed outdated 'iso' infill images and updated 'top' infill images with new versions. Added new images for adaptive cubic and 2D honeycomb infill patterns. Updated strength_settings_infill.md to revise infill strength values, descriptions, and remove references to deleted images. Introduced documentation for 2D honeycomb infill and made minor corrections and clarifications throughout.

* Revise infill pattern documentation and add comparison table

Updated strength_settings_infill.md to clarify infill density calculation, add a comprehensive comparison table of infill patterns, and standardize terminology for strength and print time. Expanded pattern descriptions to use qualitative strength ratings instead of numeric values. Updated infill_desc_calculator.xlsx to reflect these changes.

* Indentation in  code examples

Adjusted the indentation of code blocks in the cornering calibration documentation for clarity and consistency with the rest of the document.

* Update 3D Honeycomb infill strength ratings

Adjusted the horizontal strength rating for 3D Honeycomb infill from 'Normal' to 'Normal-High' in the strength settings documentation and table. Updated the infill_desc_calculator.xlsx file to reflect these changes.

* Formatting and fix in ERS documentation

Updated headings to use consistent Markdown syntax, improved clarity in explanations, and reworded references for better readability.

* Fix wall generator doc link and filename

Updated the Home.md to reference the correct 'quality_settings_wall_generator' section and renamed the corresponding documentation file for consistency.

---------

Co-authored-by: Rodrigo <162915171+RF47@users.noreply.github.com>

doc/print_settings/quality/quality_settings_seam.md

@@ -73,14 +73,14 @@ To minimize the visibility of potential over-extrusion at the start of an extern
 
   This is useful when printing with Outer/Inner or Inner/Outer/Inner wall print order, as in these modes, it is more likely an external perimeter is printed immediately after a de-retraction move, which would cause slight extrusion variance at the start of a seam.
 
-## Tips:
+## Tips
 
 With seams being inevitable when 3D printing using FFF, there are two distinct approaches on how to deal with them:
 
 1. **Try and hide the seam as much as possible:** This can be done by enabling scarf seam, which works very well, especially with simple models with limited overhang regions.
 2. **Try and make the seam as "clean" and "distinct" as possible:** This can be done by tuning the seam gap and enabling role-based wipe speed, wipe on loops, and wipe before the external loop.
 
-## Troubleshooting Seam Performance:
+## Troubleshooting Seam Performance
 
 The section below will focus on troubleshooting traditional seams. For scarf seam troubleshooting, refer to the guide linked above.
 
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ However, due to mechanical and material tolerances, as well as the very nature o
 
 ![seam-quality](https://github.com/SoftFever/OrcaSlicer/blob/main/doc/images/seam/seam-quality.jpg?raw=true)
 
-### Troubleshooting the Start of a Seam:
+### Troubleshooting the Start of a Seam
 
 Imagine the scenario where the toolhead finishes printing a layer line on one side of the bed, retracts, travels the whole distance of the bed to de-retract, and starts printing another part. Compare this to the scenario where the toolhead finishes printing an internal perimeter and only travels a few mm to start printing an external perimeter, without even retracting or de-retracting.
 
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ So this is a trade-off between print speed and print quality. From experimental
 
 In addition, larger nozzle diameters allow for more opportunity for material to leak compared to smaller diameter nozzles. A 0.2/0.25 mm nozzle will have significantly better seam performance than a 0.4, and that will have much better performance than a 0.6mm nozzle and so forth.
 
-### Troubleshooting the End of a Seam:
+### Troubleshooting the End of a Seam
 
 The end of a seam is much easier to get right, as the extrusion system is already at a pressure equilibrium while printing. It just needs to stop extruding at the right time and consistently.
 
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ Furthermore, the printer mechanics have tolerances – the print head may be req
 
 Finally, the techniques of **wiping can help improve the visual continuity and consistency of a seam** (please note, these settings do not make the seam less visible, but rather make them more consistent!). Wiping on loops with a consistent speed helps tuck in the end of the seam, hiding the effects of retraction from view.
 
-### The Role of Wall Ordering in Seam Appearance:
+### The Role of Wall Ordering in Seam Appearance
 
 The order of wall printing plays a significant role in the appearance of a seam. **Starting to print the external perimeter first after a long travel move will always result in more visible artifacts compared to printing the internal perimeters first and traveling just a few mm to print the external perimeter.**